The latest IPCC report can’t be ignored — and it does our species and planet a disservice to pretend the situation will miraculously reverse itself. Here’s an overview and what companies should do in response.
Uh-oh …
Climate change is our specialisation at BWD. But
we’re generally wary of placing too much emphasis on the catastrophic risks
associated with a 2°C (35.6°F) rise in global temperatures. Research — and our
own experience — tells us that fear generally turns people off.
But the first part of the IPCC’s sixth assessment
report (AR6), released this week, is one
of those ‘uh-oh’ moments that can’t be diminished or ignored. Despite my
familiarity with the issue, I gulped at the concreteness of the science
presented and the pace of nature’s unravelling before our eyes.
The Economist
captured this sense of foreboding well:
AT A KEY moment in the film “Jaws,” police chief Martin Brody, having known
that a shark attack was possible, witnesses one actually happen. The
director, Stephen Spielberg, underlines the transformative nature of Brody’s
shock with a shot which makes inspired use of a camera technique called a
“dolly zoom.” Nothing on screen actually moves. But Brody’s guilty face
seems to rush towards the audience, taking up more and more of the frame. At
the same time his surroundings, rather than being displaced, are revealed
more fully. The report released by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change on August 9th presents the spectacle of the possible becoming actual
in a similarly unnerving way.
Key takeaways
Leveraging AI in Service of Sustainability Marketing Campaigns
Join us in Minneapolis as Nadia James, Sustainability Marketing Program Manager at
Google, explores how both major brands and SMEs are successfully using AI to land sustainability marketing campaigns that are driving both sustainability and business performance — Wed, May 8, at Brand-Led Culture Change.
Unnerving is right. Here are some takeaways from the report.
-
Humans are responsible. Previous reports said it was “extremely likely”
that humans had caused global warming. The science is now incontrovertible:
“It is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and
land.”
-
The world is already hot. Global temperatures have skyrocketed since the
Industrial Revolution. To find a warmer period than 1850-2020, we must go
back 100,000 years to before the last ice age.
-
It will get worse. All five of the new emission scenarios in the report
predict at least 1.5°C of warming over pre-industrial levels by 2040.
-
It could be catastrophic. A 3°C (and beyond) rise is a real possibility.
This could lead to some parts of the tropics becoming too hot for outdoor
work; the death of coral
reefs;
the evisceration of the
Amazon;
the melting of the polar ice sheets; and catastrophic
fires,
floods, sea-level rises, water shortages and failed harvests.
-
We’re almost out of time. Limiting warming to 1.5°C requires the planet
to stick to a carbon budget. We only have 400 billion tonnes left to emit —
global emissions currently total 40 billion tonnes a year.
It does our species and planet a disservice to pretend the situation will
miraculously reverse itself. Nor can we bank on a breakthrough technology
appearing from the ether. It might happen, but it might not. We are in trouble
and need to act like it. Even as our planetary
boundaries
are overrun, most governments continue to urge action without actually doing
anything. Recent
analysis
of more than 800 policy decisions found that just 2 percent of global COVID-19
stimulus spending has been committed to the clean energy transition.
So, what now?
That said, there is room for cautious optimism. The International Energy Agency
predicts that
renewable electricity generation will set new records in 2021, expanding more
than 8 percent to 8,300 TWh. Solar and wind will account for two-thirds of this
growth. In addition, the share of renewables in electricity generation is
expected to hit an all-time high of 30 percent this year. When combined with
nuclear
power,
low-carbon sources of power generation will easily exceed output from coal
plants in 2021.
Business is leading the way, with some of the world’s best entrepreneurs
pursuing decarbonisation with the focus and intensity that this existential
crisis demands: 155 companies with a combined market capitalisation of $2.4
trillion have called on
governments
to decarbonise and build net-zero targets into their pandemic recovery efforts.
Climate and cleantech ETFs are proliferating, while institutional investors are
targeting climate
laggards
with punitive resolutions at their annual general meetings. Money talks — and on
the topic of climate change, it’s beginning to talk very loudly.
Your climate roadmap
We’re often asked what individual companies should be doing to help. The good
news is that a credible response to climate change is relatively straightforward
to develop, provided management understands the long-term return on investment.
Below is a high-level summary of how to implement (or improve) your climate
roadmap.
-
Measure your emissions. Find a provider who can measure your energy
consumption across the business, and convert this into Scope 1 and
2 emissions.
Consider how you can measure and report on your Scope 3
emissions. Assure your data.
-
Create a climate strategy (and tell everyone about it). Data is only
useful if it provides insights you can use. Start by conducting a gap
analysis to identify where your key climate risks and
opportunities
lie. Once finalised, create a climate strategy endorsed by your board and
executives. To maximise the financial and reputational value of your efforts
— and to signal that you’re committing to climate leadership — dedicate time
and resources to developing an outstanding sustainability report. Ideally,
align your report with leading frameworks such as the Integrated Reporting
Framework,
the SASB
Standards,
GRI and the
TCFD (see below).
-
Set science-based targets. Next, set ambitious goals to hold your
business to account. Science-based
targets offer clear guidance on how you
can reduce your emissions to support alignment with the Paris Agreement.
Science-based targets do not allow carbon
offsetting
to achieve your targets. BWD strongly supports this stance, as offsetting
tends to fund economically viable renewables projects that would have been
built anyway. Best-practice climate strategies seek to reduce operational
emissions as much as possible through energy efficiency and renewable energy
use, before turning to offsets.
-
Commit to the TCFD. The Task Force on Climate-Related Financial
Disclosures seeks to increase and improve
reporting
of climate-related financial information. It helps facilitate more informed
investment, credit and insurance underwriting decisions — which in turn,
enables greater market transparency around the financial system’s exposure
to climate-related risks. We are almost certain that regulators and
institutional investors will make TCFD reporting mandatory in all developed
markets in the coming years, so get on board (or improve the quality of your
disclosure) now.
-
Set a net-zero target (by 2030). A net-zero
target
is an aim to become carbon neutral by a certain date – offsetting is allowed
to ‘balance’ the amount of carbon released. Short- and medium-term
science-based targets can support a more ambitious net-zero target (a global
standard for net-zero business is under
development). From a public relations perspective, a net-zero target is also easier
communicate to stakeholders and can generate additional brand value.
-
Become carbon negative. Becoming carbon
negative means removing from the environment more carbon than you emit. The Future Fit Business Benchmark has more
information on what
sustainability pioneers can do to help speed this transition.
Published Aug 11, 2021 2pm EDT / 11am PDT / 7pm BST / 8pm CEST
Luke Heilbuth is CEO of BWD — a sustainability advisory firm with offices in Sydney and New York.