COVID reshaped our capacity for collaborative change. We saw that, when people had the right information, they would act accordingly. We must help people understand how to participate in the sustainable economy and what their impact can be. Even more, we must change social norms so that people feel compelled to opt in.
At the 2022 Sustainable Brands®
conference
last month, we shared a new
study
on consumer engagement and sustainable behaviors. The research revealed that
there is a spectrum of intention — from those who will “do nothing” in the face
of climate change to those who believe sustainability isn’t just a set of
choices, but a way of life.
The good news is general receptivity for sustainable behaviors is high. 50
percent of consumers are willing to adopt a mix of simple, easy behaviors to
protect the planet; and 43 percent are willing to go even further and make major
changes to their lifestyle. These are exciting data points for sustainability
practitioners and brands who are creating products that are better for the
planet.
But we also saw a challenge. When we moved from the abstract, with questions
such as, “How willing are you to adopt sustainable behaviors?” to the more
specific — i.e., gauging willingness to rent or buy used products instead of new
ones, to use products made from nature-friendly ingredients, or to skip eating
meat once a week — the numbers drop by almost half.
The standard, well-understood barriers to these more specific behaviors emerged
in our study: cost, accessibility and product
performance.
To these findings, we say:
-
The role of art in climate, sustainability and regeneration discourse
Benjamin Von Wong’s activist artistry transcends mere visual appeal — underlining the essential role of art in climate, sustainability and regeneration discourse. Join us as he explores the incredible potential of art as cultural commentary in raising awareness, and taking our shared behavioral and cultural pursuits to the next level — Wed, May 8, at Brand-Led Culture Change.
Value products and sustainable products cannot be mutually exclusive —
brands must address the economics of sustainable goods.
-
There should be no sustainable product deserts — affordable, sustainable
options must be available to everyone, everywhere.
-
Brands need to actively counter the misperceptions about the performance
of sustainable products — people must believe sustainable products are
efficacious.
But we uncovered another barrier that in many ways is best addressed by a
collective of brands — it’s an issue that transcends categories and could
benefit from a more cooperative approach. The barrier is best articulated by the
consumer sentiment, “If I knew, I would.”
Across numerous sustainable behaviors, over one-third of respondents
communicated a lack of knowledge or understanding about how, why and where to
participate, and how their participation benefited the environment.
Specifically, we learned that 38 percent of respondents would throw away fewer
products if they knew how to extend the life of existing products. They told us
they would use more nature-friendly products if they knew more about the
ingredients
(31 percent) or if the labels clearly indicated how they are nature
friendly
(39 percent). We learned that they would upgrade or update products without
having to get new
ones
(37 percent), access replacement parts or tips for repairs (34 percent), and
upcycle or use products in a different or new way at end of life (32 percent) —
if they knew how.
This is a unique moment in time. More people than ever before are concerned
about the health of our planet. Consumers have never been more primed for new
behaviors in pursuit of a better future. COVID reshaped our capacity for change
and collaboration. We saw, repeatedly, that if a consumer had the right
information, they would act accordingly – if they knew.
We must seize the moment and help people understand how to participate in the
sustainable economy and what their impact can be. Even more, we must change
social norms so that people feel compelled to opt in.
We believe there is a striking opening to influence behavior change at scale —
an opportunity to drive greater adoption of the more conscious
behaviors
that will ultimately fuel the long-term habits of purchasing sustainable
products. We also believe this will require a coalition — no single brand can
help create the environment for large-scale behavior change.
There is a precedent for fueling this kind of change through public
education.
Broad, sweeping campaigns helped change the trajectory of smoking. They taught
people to wear seat belts, to stop littering, and to eat
differently
for better health. There is an opportunity for brands to partner on this
together, to form a coalition and help move consumers across the sustainability
spectrum.
In 2022, businesses remain the most trusted institution in our
nation — ahead of NGOs,
government and the media. This is both an opportunity and a responsibility.
People are exercising their agency through the brands they
choose.
And it’s never been clearer that brands must think seriously — not just about
their environmental impact, but how they will participate in shaping a safe,
sustainable, even regenerative
future.
If they knew, they would.
Let’s help them; so, they do.
Published Nov 2, 2022 2pm EDT / 11am PDT / 6pm GMT / 7pm CET
Sponsored Content
/ This article is sponsored by
Porter Novelli.
This article, produced in cooperation with the Sustainable Brands editorial team, has been paid for by one of our sponsors.