It remains to be seen whether the SEC’s proposed climate-disclosure rules will go into effect; but with the EU bringing in sustainable textile regulations and states passing laws on supply chain due diligence, increased scrutiny over the climate impacts of brands and retailers will continue to grow.
As the global focus on climate change increases, so has the attention of
governments and regulators on efforts to decrease global greenhouse gas, or GHG,
emissions. In March, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed rule
changes
that would require publicly traded corporations in the United States to
include certain climate-related disclosures in their registration statements and
periodic reports — including information about climate-related
risks
that are reasonably likely to have a material impact on their business. The
rules would also require companies to provide data on their Scope 1 and Scope 2
emissions — direct GHG emissions from operations and from the energy they use.
In some cases, the rule change will also apply to Scope 3
emissions
— those generated up and down companies’ value chains.
Many brands and retailers have made progress when it comes to decreasing their
Scope 1 and 2 emissions; however, due to the nature of Scope 3 emissions, they
have been more difficult to measure and manage. According to
McKinsey,
Scope 3 emissions can account for as much as 98 percent of the total carbon
footprint of home and fashion retailers. And while some brands and retailers
have voluntarily reported their Scope 3
emissions,
many do not have the resources to do so.
Scope 3 emissions are generated across a company’s value chain — often at farms,
fabric mills and manufacturers — so, it’s important to have visibility on
emissions generated at each step of the process to understand where those
emissions are generated to enable accurate reporting and targeted efforts to
mitigate. One program, the U.S. Cotton Trust
Protocol, aims to help brands and retailers have
visibility of the Scope 3 emissions related to cotton production.
Launched in 2020, the program brings quantifiable and verifiable goals and
measurement of the key sustainability metrics of US cotton production with a
vision to set a new standard in sustainable cotton production where full
transparency is a reality and continuous improvement to reduce our environmental
footprint is the central goal.
A New Era for Brand Integrity: Navigating the Greenhush-Greenwash Spectrum
Join us as leaders from Republik, NielsenIQ, Conspirators, Henoscene, be/co, The Guardian and Room & Board analyze what newly expanded notions of brand integrity mean for brands, and how to be smarter about picking language choices that avoid the dangerous extremes of greenhushing and greenwashing — Thurs, May 9, at Brand-Led Culture Change.
Last November, the Trust Protocol published its inaugural Annual Report that highlighted aggregate farm-level
data from its pilot year — which included 300 grower members in 16 states and
147 counties. This involved the weighted average from harvested acres for the
six individual environmental metrics outlined in the 2025 national goals for
continuous
improvement.
The report also benchmarked against the 2015 ag districts across the
cotton-growing states, which were chosen as they represent actual crop
management practices.
A focus on sustainable agricultural practices can reduce emissions related to
climate change by decreasing GHG emissions and sequestering carbon in soil. In
cotton production, GHG emissions come from two main sources: energy use and
nitrogen fertilizer. According to data, in 2020/21 Trust Protocol grower member
energy use aggregate showed a 15 percent improvement against the 2025
sustainability goal.
“U.S. Cotton Trust Protocol grower members are using more fuel-efficient
equipment and implementing practices such as reduced tillage and planting cover
crops,
which increases biodiversity and naturally reduces fertilizer use,” says Trust
Protocol President Dr. Gary Adams. “Our 2021 data shows grower members’ work
is having a positive impact — already cutting carbon dioxide by 25 percent
relative to the 2015 baseline, keeping us on track to hit our goal of a 39
percent decrease by 2025.”
Implementing regenerative agriculture
practices
also enhances the bio sequestration and the storing of carbon. In our pilot
year, 45 percent of Trust Protocol growers already incorporated windbreaks for
erosion control, 79 percent maintained erosion control structures for minimizing
soil loss, and 93 percent practiced conservation tillage operations — all
sustainable growing practices that help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In
addition, they influence soil nutrient availability, water holding capacity,
biodiversity, ecotoxicity, and the overall ecosystem.
By signing up for the Trust Protocol, brands and retailers gain access to US
cotton with sustainability credentials proven via Field to Market: The
Alliance for Sustainable Agriculture, measured via the Fieldprint Calculator
and verified with Control Union Certifications.
Adams says he is encouraged by this new era of disclosure: “The Trust Protocol
sees the value in increased transparency. If the SEC climate disclosure rules go
into effect, the Trust Protocol can be a good resource for many brands and
retailers in the fashion and textile industries to provide some of the data they
need.”
On May 9th, the SEC announced that it had extended the deadline to June 17th for
public comments regarding the proposed rules. It remains to be seen if these
rules will go into effect; but with the EU soon bringing in sustainable
textile regulations and individual states passing laws on supply chain due
diligence,
one thing is for certain: Increased scrutiny over the environmental footprint of
brands and retailers will continue to grow.
Published Jun 6, 2022 8am EDT / 5am PDT / 1pm BST / 2pm CEST
Sponsored Content
/ This article is sponsored by
U.S. Cotton Trust Protocol.
This article, produced in cooperation with the Sustainable Brands editorial team, has been paid for by one of our sponsors.