SBTi target-setters are ahead of schedule: Since setting targets, these companies have reduced their annual emissions 25% since 2015 — a rate that exceeds the rate needed to limit warming to 1.5°C.
A new analysis
released this week of 338 companies, out of the 478 total
companies with targets approved by the Science Based Targets initiative
(SBTi), shows for the first time that companies that have set science-based
targets are delivering emissions reductions in line with the most ambitious goal
of the Paris Agreement.
The 338 companies analyzed (including AT&T, Caesars Entertainment, CVS Health, Electrolux, General Mills, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Nestlé, Novo Nordisk, PepsiCo, Procter & Gamble, Stanley Black and Decker and Unilever, to name a few) collectively reduced their
annual emissions by 25 percent between 2015 and 2019 — a difference of 302
million tonnes, which is equivalent to the annual emissions of 78 coal-fired
power plants — in contrast to an increase of 3.4 percent in global emissions
from energy and industrial processes over the same period (see Fig 1, below).
This exceeds SBTi’s estimates for potential emissions reductions from this time
last
year.
SBTi says that last year, with all of the challenges introduced by the ongoing
COVID-19 pandemic, was a milestone year for science-based climate
commitments: The rate of adoption doubled in 2020, versus 2015-2019 — over 1,000
companies, making up 20 percent of global market capitalization, have now set,
or committed to set, a science-based target.
Amazon, Facebook and Ford are among the over 370 companies that
joined the SBTi in 2020.
This is the first-ever study to look at how setting science-based targets
correlates with corporate emissions reductions and the extent to which companies
are actually delivering on those targets. SBTi found that the typical
company with SBTs actually slashed direct (scope 1 and 2) emissions at a linear
annual rate (6.4 percent) that exceeds the rate required under the SBTi’s
criteria to meet 1.5°C-aligned warming scenarios (4.2 percent).
Additionally, more companies are raising the ambition for their targets: 41
percent of all SBTi companies have 1.5°C-aligned scope 1 and 2 targets, vs a 2°C
pathway.
The research also suggests that science-based targets are catalyzing system-wide
change — including large-scale investment in mitigation activities and a
greening of global supply
chains.
The planned emissions reductions of companies with approved science-based
targets will channel up to US$25.9 billion of new investment into
climate-mitigation initiatives in the next decade.
Alexander Farsan, Global Lead on Science Based Targets at SBTi partner
WWF, said:
“Today’s findings are a mark of progress at the beginning of a critical year
for climate action. It shows that companies setting science-based targets are
backing these commitments up with action — delivering the emissions reductions
we know are vital if we want to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. SBTi
companies have cut their emissions by a quarter over the last five years — and
we need more companies to follow in their footsteps. With COP26 on the horizon,
now is the time for the private sector to step up to the plate and follow the
science. If a company is genuine about protecting the climate, then it should be
setting science-based targets.”
Progress has been particularly strong in developed economies: In 16 OECD
countries, a critical mass of 20 percent of high-emitting companies setting
science-based targets has now been reached. In 2020, this 20 percent threshold
was also reached in six new sectors — including the high-emitting and
hard-to-abate cement and concrete
sector.
However, there is huge potential to further scale up action and improve progress
in high-emitting sectors such as
construction
and automotive.
The global picture also shows that some regions are lagging, in terms of
commitments. In Europe, a critical mass of corporates with Paris-aligned
climate commitments has been reached: 34 percent of all companies with the
greatest climate impact have committed to, or set, SBTs; in contrast to just 16
percent in North America and 12 percent in Asia.
"This will be a crucial year for climate action, and we believe the private
sector has a vital role to play in the transition to a zero-carbon economy.
That's why we updated our target with the SBTi and have aligned our ambition —
across our whole value chain — with a 1.5°C world," says Kristina Kloberdanz, Chief Sustainability Officer at Mastercard, one of the SBTi companies analyzed. "We are already making progress
toward this target by focusing on key areas of our business, including
decarbonization of our operations and supply chains, while also leveraging our
technology and global network to make a positive impact on the environment at
scale. Today's data shows that increasingly more corporates are stepping up
their role in this collaborative effort to address the climate challenge — and
as an SBTi company, we're proud to be at the forefront of this change."
Of course, progress reporting is critical to the credibility of companies’
science-based targets — it provides a complete picture of overall emissions
reductions, as well as where companies may be failing to meet their goals. As we
move into this critical decade for climate action, tracking progress on
emissions reductions is vital. Encouragingly, SBTi says the vast majority of
companies (87 percent) that have had science-based targets for over a year have
publicly reported progress against these goals in some form.
Learn more from SBTI’s progress report
here
Published Jan 28, 2021 1pm EST / 10am PST / 6pm GMT / 7pm CET
Sustainable Brands Staff